16.2

site/posts/multivariable-thomas-16.2.html

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+[!]
+[=post-]
+<p>
+    Welcome back! We continue chapter 16 with a discussion of <i>vector fields</i>. Essentially, a vector field is a function with the same input dimensions as output dimensions. In `R^2` and `R^3`,
+    we visualize this as a bunch of vectors permeating all of space. If you've taken physics, you've probably encountered vector fields - the electric and magnetic fields are in fact
+    vector fields! A way to think about vector fields is as the <i>velocity</i> of a given infinitesimal region of a fluid: it's at a position, and the velocity vector is pointing in some direction
+    with some magnitude. This is actually a very good way to represent a flowing fluid, for our purposes.
+</p>
+<p>
+    An example of a vector field we've used extensively thus far is the gradient function of a surface! At every point along the surface,
+    it outputs a vector representing the slope at that point.
+</p>
+<p>
+    One of the most useful operations we can perform on a vector field is a line integral (remember 16.1?). The integral of a vector field over a line is a fairly abstract concept,
+    but it has real-world uses: imagine we have a function for the force at any given point, and we want to know the total force over a line. Vector fields! The form for a vector
+    field integral is simply the dot product of the vector field and the tangent vector to the point on our line: given a line `r(t)` in a vector field `f(x, y) = [u, v]`, we have
+    `int f(x, y) * dr`. This is one of those very elegant things that has interesting consequences.
+</p>
+<p>
+    Let's do an example. Straight from the textbook, we have `f(x, y, z) = \[z, xy, -y^2]` and `r(t) = \[t^2, t, sqrt(t)]`, where `a <= t <= b`. Getting `f(x, y, z)` in terms of `t` is simple enough:
+    just substitute the components of `r`: `f(t) = \[sqrt(t), t^3, -t^2]`. `dr` is going to be `frac {dr} {dt} * dt`, so let's find `frac {dr} {dt}`:
+    `frac d {dt} \[t^2, t, sqrt(t)] = \[2t, 1, frac 1 {2sqrt(t)}]`.
+    So our integral is `int_a^b \[sqrt(t), t^3, -t^2] * \[2t, 1, frac 1 {2sqrt(t)}] dt`. Evaluating the dot product gives us `int_a^b 2t^{3/2} + t^3 - frac {t^{3/2}} {2} dt`.
+    I'll leave further simplification as an exercise to the reader.
+</p>
+<p>
+    This section is cut rather short, as the introduced idea is simple and it's too late at night to try making it more complex. I might expand it
+    with more examples and applications later. Section 16.3 will go into quite a bit more detail, as we'll be dealing with the problem of conservative vs
+    nonconservative paths. For now, da svidanya and bonne nuit!
+</p>
+<p>
+    P.S: If you notice broken or missing math, it's probably due to my template engine freaking out about the square brackets. Will fix in a bit!
+</p>
+[/]
+[=title "Multivariable Exam 3 Review: Thomas 16.2"]
+[=author "Tyler Clarke"]
+[=date "2025-4-3"]
+[=subject "Calculus"]
+[#post.html]